
|
One of the most important aspects that affect performance of a company as a whole and of its constituents as such is the overall ambience in the work place. Many organizations reach a plateau of evolution and growth mostly due to an environment of fear, resentment and lack of trust. When the higher ranking officers in a company handle difficult situations and poor results or any other “under pressure” circumstances by questioning collaborators, offering angry recriminations and demeaning staff in public, they achieve an environment of intimidation and distrust. When this happens people tend to withhold information, in particular bad news, stop presenting freely and spontaneously ideas and eventually may even jump ship. Managers often try to escape an image of wrong doing in terms of dealing with people. They are driven by the rules and the book, however they tend to simplify the fact that the issue is not the rule but the way they deal with it and with colleagues who may have overlooked it. It is the style, the delivery more than the content as such. This approach of management by coercion, due to research generated evidence, is giving way to emotional intelligence as a leadership approach. In reality, poor communication, the silence of middle management can devastate a company. When a collaborative employee does not share ideas, or opinions with their superiors due to fear, the decisions of that manager suffer, because he has a skewed view of what is really going on in the organization and with the market place. In real life the employees who have to face a boss under fear suffer physical reactions that impair their contributions. These are categorized as toxic encounters that tend to alienate employees. The obvious question is what to do? Many things can be done. For example, allow middle managers to fight back, actually give them a tool to do it with. The idea of the GLEs (Grupos de Liderazgo Extendido) is precisely that. Also, managers may accept the value of changing and may try the kind-and-gentle approach. It is amazing how it works. There are other ways, one very popular one is Management by Walking Around and Listening (MBWAL). This is a technique which is aimed at developing positive employee relationship, very much like the open door policy. It is a means of promoting effective two way communication between employees and managers. Two way communication programs are designed in a fashion that allows for effective and responsible information to flow between employees and management. The success of such a program is based on the ability to achieve and control some conditions. • Honest frank and open communication is viewed as a means to achieve company goals, and not to undermine authority and control MBWAL is a simple management process with tremendous business benefits if done correctly and consistently. When MBWAL is done erroneously or poorly there may be adverse consequences. From a management point of view what you do is as follows: • Get out and walk all spaces several times a month. Walk un-announced. You do not necessarily have to talk to everyone, you just want to be seen and show interest
|
|||||
Información Legal Este artículo es Copyright de su autor(a). El autor(a) es responsable por el contenido y las opiniones expresadas, así como de la legitimidad de su autoría. El contenido puede ser incluido en publicaciones o webs con fines informativos y educativos (pero no comerciales), si se respetan las siguientes condiciones: 1) se publique tal como está, sin alteraciones 2) se haga referencia al autor (George Kastner) 3) se haga referencia a la fuente (degerencia.com) 4) se provea un enlace al artículo original (http://www.degerencia.com/articulo/ management-styles-management-by-walking-around-as-an-option) 5) se provea un enlace a los datos del autor (http://www.degerencia.com/kastner) |